Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic value of carbohydrate antigen 50 in biliary tract cancer: A large‐scale multicenter study.

Authors :
Wang, Yong‐Shuai
Wang, Wei
Zhang, Shen‐Yu
Cai, Wei
Song, Rui‐Peng
Mei, Tao
Zhang, Feng
Qi, Fei‐Yu
Zhang, Sai
Liu, Yan
Li, Hao‐Ran
Ji, Peng
Gao, Miao
Song, Hua‐Chuan
Yao, Huan‐Zhang
Meng, Fan‐Zheng
Lu, Zheng
Wang, Ji‐Zhou
Liu, Lian‐Xin
Source :
Cancer Medicine. Jun2024, Vol. 13 Issue 12, p1-15. 15p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: To date, carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have been widely used for the screening, diagnosis and prediction of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. However, few studies with large sample sizes of carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50) were reported in BTC patients. Methods: A total of 1121 patients from the Liver Cancer Clin‐Bio Databank of Anhui Hepatobiliary Surgery Union between January 2017 and December 2022 were included in this study (673 in the training cohort and 448 in the validation cohort): among them, 458 with BTC, 178 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 23 with combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma, and 462 with nontumor patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and clinical usefulness. Results: ROC curves obtained by combining CA50, CA19‐9, and AFP showed that the AUC value of the diagnostic MODEL 1 was 0.885 (95% CI 0.856–0.885, specificity 70.3%, and sensitivity 84.0%) in the training cohort and 0.879 (0.841–0.917, 76.7%, and 84.3%) in the validation cohort. In addition, comparing iCCA and HCC (235 in the training cohort, 157 in the validation cohort), the AUC values of the diagnostic MODEL 2 were 0.893 (95% CI 0.853–0.933, specificity 96%, and sensitivity 68.6%) in the training cohort and 0.872 (95% CI 0.818–0.927, 94.2%, and 64.6%) in the validation cohort. Conclusion: The model combining CA50, CA19‐9, and AFP not only has good diagnostic value for BTC but also has good diagnostic value for distinguishing iCCA and HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20457634
Volume :
13
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178131378
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7388