Applying artificial neural network to zero-crossing wave parameters for the wave spectrum.

This paper presents a neural network model to estimate wave spectra from wave parameters by the zero-crossing analysis, maximum, significant, and average wave heights and their corresponding wave periods. The present model was trained with the wave data in the JES (Japan/East Sea), and then applied to wave measurements in the Yellow Sea and the South Sea for its feasibility at other seas. According to the present study, the predicted wave spectra well agree with the measurements, even the wave data not in model training. This comparison shows that the accuracy of the present model is comparable to that of JONSWAP wave spectrum. Furthermore, the present model was employed to the wave hindcasting to see its applicability, while JONSWAP wave spectrum also being applied. The significant wave heights from both numerical simulations well agree with the measured ones. However, the average RMSE of significant wave period with the present neural network was 7.08 % smaller than the other, and its Pearson's correlation coefficient is 6.33 % larger on average. From this, it can be seen that the present model was well applied to the wave hindcasting without considering the local wave measurements. • This paper presents a neural network model to estimate wave spectra from wave parameters by the zero-crossing analysis, maximum, significant, and average heights and the corresponding wave periods. • The wave spectra predicted by the present model well agree with the measured ones. The accuracy of present model is comparable to that of JONSWAP wave spectrum with Hwang et al.'s (2021) peak enhancement factor, comparing them. • The present model was employed to the wave hindcasting in Young-il bay to see its applicability. The numerical simulation with incident waves by JONSWAP wave spectrum was also carried out to compare the applicability of both models. • The numerical results show that the significant wave heights from both models are similar to each other. However, the significant wave period with the present model is more accurate than the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]