Repeated drone photogrammetry surveys demonstrate that reconstructed canopy heights are sensitive to wind speed but relatively insensitive to illumination conditions.

Unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) based structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry surveys are becoming a standard tool for ecologists to measure plant structure and biomass in non-forest ecosystems. The reproducibility of SfM survey results under different operational conditions, namely wind speed, sun elevation, and cloud condition, is poorly understood. It is also unclear to what extent commonly applied point-to-grid interpolation of derived point clouds affects inference of vegetation structure. These knowledge gaps limit the use of these methods for measuring and monitoring detection. We captured 61 UAV SfM surveys at the same study area under a range of wind/sun/cloud conditions over a 24-day period during 2021 and used generalized linear mixed effects models to test how the structural reconstructions varied with environmental conditions. Wind speed significantly influenced the canopy height reconstructions, with greater wind speeds reducing mean canopy height. Different plant species exhibited varying sensitivities to wind that are likely related to leaf attributes (size, structure, and density), growth form of the canopy, and physical properties such as limb flexibility. The movement of plants can reduce canopy height estimates derived from photogrammetric surveys, even under relatively low wind speeds. Reconstructed canopy heights were comparatively insensitive to solar elevation variations. Cloud conditions and illumination by direct sunlight had a weak, non-significant effect on reconstructed canopy height, with sunny conditions (generating shadows) resulting in a measurable but marginal reduction in mean canopy heights. When comparing canopy heights of interpolated and discontinuous derived canopy height models the results highlighted that these were insensitive to interpolation in this specific setting. We recommend measuring mean wind speeds throughout surveys where comparisons are to be made between different drone-based SfM surveys of vegetation over either time or space. Care should be taken to ensure that the effects of wind are controlled for so that inferences are valid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]