Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Aged over and under 65 Years (ENANTIA-65).

Authors :
Benucci, Maurizio
Bardelli, Marco
Cazzato, Massimiliano
Bartoli, Francesca
Damiani, Arianna
Li Gobbi, Francesca
Bandinelli, Francesca
Panaccione, Anna
Di Cato, Luca
Niccoli, Laura
Frediani, Bruno
Mosca, Marta
Guiducci, Serena
Cantini, Fabrizio
Source :
Journal of Personalized Medicine. Jul2024, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p712. 12p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: According to recent data, the age of patients could represent an important risk factor for MACE (major cardiovascular events), cancer, and VTE (venous thromboembolism) during treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. We decided to analyze the population involved in the ReLiFiRa study by identifying two groups of patients: 65 years or more and less than 65 years of age, evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of 200 mg of Filgotinib daily. Methods: Of the 120 ReLiFiRa patients, 54 were younger than 65 years old and 66 patients were 65 years old or older. The data of efficacy and tolerability of treatment with FIL 200 mg daily for 6 months were evaluated. Results: After six months of treatment, FIL was effective in both age groups. In both groups, the median values of steroid DAS28, CDAI, ERS, PCR, tender joints, swollen joints, VAS, HAQ, PGA patients, and PGA physicians were reduced with a statistically significant difference comparing these values with the baseline values. The difference in age did not impact the effectiveness of the drug. The lipid profile data also did not demonstrate significant differences between the two age groups; however, the comparison between younger vs. older patients' populations regarding the total cholesterol/HDL ratio and LDL/HDL ratio shows a statistically significant difference: total cholesterol/HDL 3.4 (2.12–3.66) vs. 3.64 (3.36–4.13) p = 0.0004, LDL/HDL 1.9 (0.98–2.25) vs. 2.41 (2.04–2.73) p = 0.0002. There are no differences regarding the atherogenic index (LDL-C/HDL-C) and coronary risk index (TC/HDL-C) compared to baseline. Conclusions: After six months of treatment with FIL, the older population group showed a higher level of LDL and a lower level of HDL compared to younger patients. The atherogenic index and coronary risk index are higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years, but interestingly, there were no differences when comparing the 6-month data to baseline values. This condition highlights the impact of typical risk factors that act independently of treatment with Filgotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754426
Volume :
14
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178696121
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070712