Back to Search Start Over

Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study.

Authors :
Kose, Halil Cihan
Guven Kose, Selin
Celikel, Feyza
Tulgar, Serkan
Akkaya, Omer Taylan
Source :
Journal of Personalized Medicine. Jul2024, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p721. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-guided cervical selective nerve root block (CSNRB) procedures are increasingly being performed as an alternative to conventional fluoroscopy (FL)-guided epidural injections for the treatment of cervical radicular pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of US-guided CSNRB versus FL-guided interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection (IL-CESI) for cervical radicular pain. A total of 60 patients with cervical radicular pain due to a single-level disc herniation were randomized into either the FL or US group. The numeric rating scale, Short Form-36, and neck disability index were evaluated before treatment at months 1, 3, and 6 after treatment. Procedure time, complications, pain medication consumption, and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Patients experienced significant improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life scores up to 6 months after the procedure (p < 0.001). Treatment success rate was achieved in 56.6% of the IL-CESI group and 50% of the CSNRB group without any significant difference between the study arms (p = 0.617). US-guided CSNRB was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided IL-CESI in the treatment of cervical radicular pain, in addition to the absence of radiation exposure and requiring less procedure time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754426
Volume :
14
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178696130
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070721