Back to Search Start Over

Utilization of Face-to-Face Vestibular Support Groups: A Comparison to Online Group Participation.

Authors :
Vanstrum, Erik B.
Jung Kim, Min
Ziltzer, Ryan S.
Doherty, Joni K.
Bassett, Alaina M.
Source :
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Aug2024, Vol. 133 Issue 8, p713-719. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the utilization and outcomes of face-to-face (F2F) vestibular support groups and online support communities (OSC) for individuals with vestibular disorders. Methods: We distributed a 31-question anonymous electronic survey through the Vestibular Disorders Association (VeDA) to F2F participants, categorizing user involvement in F2F, OSCs, or both and assessed impact on medical decision-making, psychosocial benefits, and goals achieved. Results: The F2F cohort consisted of 97 individuals comprising primarily of non-Hispanic White women (mean age = 57 years, SD ± 14 years) with diagnoses including persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (19%), Meniere's disease (15%), and vestibular neuritis (13%). Most participants were diagnosed by an otolaryngologist (65%) and attended F2F meetings monthly or less frequently (78%). The OSC group comprised of 551 individuals, primarily of non-Hispanic White women, but was younger in age (mean age = 50 years, SD ± 13 years). OSC participants notably engaged more, with 36% participating on a daily basis and 32% multiple times a week. F2F participants were older (mean age 57 years vs 50 years, P <.001) and more commonly referred by medical professionals (22% F2F vs 6% OSC, P <.001). Both groups had similar achieved goals, including hearing from others with the same diagnosis (84% vs 89%, P >.05) and similar impact on medical decision-making (75% vs 78%, P >.05). More F2F participants reported increased development of coping skills (79% F2F vs 69% OSC, P =.037). OSC participants typically found the group via an online search (75%), compared to 51% for F2F. OSC participants had higher daily engagement (36%) compared to F2F (1%). Conclusion: F2F users are older and more commonly referred by medical professionals. Despite less frequent engagement, F2F participants reported similar influences on achieved goals, medical decision-making, and impact on psychosocial benefits. These findings highlight the importance of both F2F and OSC support groups for individuals with vestibular disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034894
Volume :
133
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178718289
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241241861