Back to Search Start Over

Development of a non-invasive diagnostic model for high-risk esophageal varices based on radiomics of spleen CT.

Authors :
Yan, Cheng
Li, Min
Liu, Changchun
Zhang, Zhe
Zhang, Jingwen
Gao, Mingzi
Han, Jing
Zhang, Mingxin
Zhao, Liqin
Source :
Abdominal Radiology. Aug2024, p1-10.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics models derived from multi-phase spleen CT for high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in cirrhotic patients.We retrospectively selected cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices from two hospitals from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients underwent non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans and were categorized into HREV and non-HREV groups based on endoscopic evaluations. Radiomics features were extracted from spleen CT images in non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, with feature selection via lasso regression and Pearson’s correlation. Ten machine learning models were developed to diagnose HREV, evaluated by area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values of the three groups of models were statistically compared by the Kruskal–Wallis H test and Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Among 233 patients, 11, 6, and 11 features were selected from non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, respectively. Significant differences in AUC values were observed across phases (p < 0.05), and the arterial phase models showed the highest AUC values. The best model in arterial phase was the logical regression model, whose AUC value was 0.85, sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity was 80% and F1 score was 0.81.Radiomics models based on spleen CT, especially the arterial phase models, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for HREV, offering the potential for early detection and intervention.Methods: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics models derived from multi-phase spleen CT for high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in cirrhotic patients.We retrospectively selected cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices from two hospitals from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients underwent non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans and were categorized into HREV and non-HREV groups based on endoscopic evaluations. Radiomics features were extracted from spleen CT images in non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, with feature selection via lasso regression and Pearson’s correlation. Ten machine learning models were developed to diagnose HREV, evaluated by area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values of the three groups of models were statistically compared by the Kruskal–Wallis H test and Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Among 233 patients, 11, 6, and 11 features were selected from non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, respectively. Significant differences in AUC values were observed across phases (p < 0.05), and the arterial phase models showed the highest AUC values. The best model in arterial phase was the logical regression model, whose AUC value was 0.85, sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity was 80% and F1 score was 0.81.Radiomics models based on spleen CT, especially the arterial phase models, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for HREV, offering the potential for early detection and intervention.Results: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics models derived from multi-phase spleen CT for high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in cirrhotic patients.We retrospectively selected cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices from two hospitals from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients underwent non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans and were categorized into HREV and non-HREV groups based on endoscopic evaluations. Radiomics features were extracted from spleen CT images in non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, with feature selection via lasso regression and Pearson’s correlation. Ten machine learning models were developed to diagnose HREV, evaluated by area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values of the three groups of models were statistically compared by the Kruskal–Wallis H test and Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Among 233 patients, 11, 6, and 11 features were selected from non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, respectively. Significant differences in AUC values were observed across phases (p < 0.05), and the arterial phase models showed the highest AUC values. The best model in arterial phase was the logical regression model, whose AUC value was 0.85, sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity was 80% and F1 score was 0.81.Radiomics models based on spleen CT, especially the arterial phase models, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for HREV, offering the potential for early detection and intervention.Conclusion: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics models derived from multi-phase spleen CT for high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in cirrhotic patients.We retrospectively selected cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices from two hospitals from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients underwent non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans and were categorized into HREV and non-HREV groups based on endoscopic evaluations. Radiomics features were extracted from spleen CT images in non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, with feature selection via lasso regression and Pearson’s correlation. Ten machine learning models were developed to diagnose HREV, evaluated by area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values of the three groups of models were statistically compared by the Kruskal–Wallis H test and Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Among 233 patients, 11, 6, and 11 features were selected from non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, respectively. Significant differences in AUC values were observed across phases (p < 0.05), and the arterial phase models showed the highest AUC values. The best model in arterial phase was the logical regression model, whose AUC value was 0.85, sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity was 80% and F1 score was 0.81.Radiomics models based on spleen CT, especially the arterial phase models, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for HREV, offering the potential for early detection and intervention.Graphical abstract: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics models derived from multi-phase spleen CT for high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in cirrhotic patients.We retrospectively selected cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices from two hospitals from September 2019 to September 2023. Patients underwent non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans and were categorized into HREV and non-HREV groups based on endoscopic evaluations. Radiomics features were extracted from spleen CT images in non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, with feature selection via lasso regression and Pearson’s correlation. Ten machine learning models were developed to diagnose HREV, evaluated by area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values of the three groups of models were statistically compared by the Kruskal–Wallis H test and Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Among 233 patients, 11, 6, and 11 features were selected from non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases, respectively. Significant differences in AUC values were observed across phases (p < 0.05), and the arterial phase models showed the highest AUC values. The best model in arterial phase was the logical regression model, whose AUC value was 0.85, sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity was 80% and F1 score was 0.81.Radiomics models based on spleen CT, especially the arterial phase models, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for HREV, offering the potential for early detection and intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2366004X
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Abdominal Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178761038
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04509-z