Back to Search Start Over

Optimizing hook implantation angle of the clavicular hook plate: a cadaveric study.

Authors :
Saengsirinavin, Pamok
Iamsirikulmit, Chumnarn
Piyapittayanun, Peerapong
Phiphobmongkol, Vajarin
Jongthanakamol, Thanawan
Ratanalekha, Rosarin
Source :
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. Jul2024, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p2653-2661. 9p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: While Clavicle hook plates have demonstrated favorable results regarding bone and shoulder function, their design can potentially lead to complications due to pressure concentration at the plate's tip. This study aims to investigate the impact of different hook implantation angles on the contact surface area between the hook plate and acromion, with the goal of minimizing mismatch and maximizing contact surface area. Methods: Twenty soft shoulder cadavers were included in the study, and the contact surface area of the hook plate was measured in different positions based on the hook implantation angle. Results: The results showed variations in compatibility, width, and length of the contact surface area depending on the hook implantation angle and the medial or lateral row placement. The lateral row generally demonstrated superior compatibility (84.0% vs 46.67%, p-value < 0.001), with a broader contact area (3.55 ± 0.08 mm vs 3.09 ± 0.10 mm, p-value = 0.004) and a longer contact area (7.36 ± 0.19 mm vs 5.10 ± 0.23 mm, p-value < 0.001) at specific angles. A detailed analysis of the lateral position revealed that the zero angle of implantation resulted in the greatest contact surface area, measuring 3.91 ± 0.70 mm in width (p value = 0.083) and 8.85 ± 1.24 mm in length (p value < 0.001). Conclusion: Placing the hook laterally and at the zero position according to the hook implantation angle can maximize contact surface area, may reduce stress concentration, and minimize complications in hook plate fixation. Further research and consideration of anatomical variations are warranted to refine the placement technique and enhance patient outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level V evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16338065
Volume :
34
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178774553
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03981-z