Back to Search Start Over

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial.

Authors :
Singh, Nishita
Kenney, Carol C
Butcher, Ken S
Buck, Brian
Barber, Philip A
Field, Thalia S
Choi, Philip M
Yu, Amy YX
Kleinig, Timothy
Appireddy, Ramana
Molina, Carlos A
Muir, Keith W
Hill, Michael D
Coutts, Shelagh B
Source :
International Journal of Stroke. Aug2024, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p817-822. 6p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Almost half of acute ischemic stroke patients present with mild symptoms and there are large practice variations in their treatment globally. Individuals with an intracranial occlusion who present with minor stroke are at an increased risk of early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis in the subgroup of patients with minor deficits showed benefit of alteplase in improving outcomes; however, this benefit has not been seen with intravenous alteplase in published randomized trials. Design: TEMPO-2 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) is a prospective, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomized controlled trial, designed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) over nonthrombolytic standard of care, with an estimated sample size of 1274 patients. Adult patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ⩽ 5 and visible arterial occlusion or perfusion deficit within 12 h of onset are randomized to receive either tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or standard of care. The primary outcome is return to baseline neurological functioning, measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes include death and symptomatic hemorrhage (intra or extra-cranial). Other secondary outcomes include mRS 0–1, mRS 0–2, ordinal shift analysis of the mRS, partial, and full recanalization on follow-up computed tomography angiogram. Conclusion: Results of this trial will aid in determining whether there is benefit of using tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) in treating patients presenting with minor stroke who are at high risk of developing poor outcomes due to presence of an intracranial occlusion. Data access statement: Data will be available upon reasonable request. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17474930
Volume :
19
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Stroke
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178804875
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241253702