Back to Search Start Over

Determination of angle of impact and directionality of drip stains on various fabrics.

Authors :
Drazdik, Dylan J.
Hammond, David M.
Worst, Travis J.
Oechsle, Crystal M.
Source :
Forensic Science International. Aug2024, Vol. 361, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) on absorbent surfaces, such as fabrics, is far more complex compared to its application on smooth, hard, non-porous surfaces. Angle of impact and directionality are commonly interpreted from bloodstains but may be adversely affected by porous surfaces. In fact, there is a lack of evidence that traditional approaches to BPA are even applicable when blood impacts absorbent materials such as clothing and other fabrics. Hence, there is a critical need for research focusing on the validity and reliability of methods for bloodstain pattern analysis on textiles. Here, human blood drops were deposited on six different fabric types (cotton, satin polyester, rayon, blended polyester/spandex, blended nylon/spandex, and blended modal/polyester/spandex) at two known impact angles: 30° and 10°. Bloodstain morphology was found to be unique for each fabric. Calculated angles of impact for cotton and satin polyester were not statistically different from the known angle of impact while blended polyester/spandex, blended nylon/spandex, and blended modal/polyester/spandex significantly underestimated the known angle of impact. Even when stain morphology on fabric resembled those on a glass control, the angle of impact significantly underestimated the known. The ability to assign directionality based upon bloodstain morphology was dependent on the fabric type. These findings support the need for further research and the development of guidelines for bloodstain pattern interpretation on fabric materials. • Bloodstain area on some fabrics was smaller than glass despite evidence of wicking. • Impact angle varied with wicking and fabric thickness, roughness, and construction. • Known and estimated impact angles were consistent for cotton, polyester, and rayon. • On single knit fabrics, the known impact angle was underestimated. • The ability to assign directionality was dependent on the fabric type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03790738
Volume :
361
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Forensic Science International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178809459
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112096