Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the Management and Outcome of Patients with Retained Products of Conception after Gestational Week 23+0: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors :
Pateisky, Petra
Mikula, Fanny
Adamovic, Marija
Neumüller, Jana
Chalubinski, Kinga
Falcone, Veronica
Springer, Stephanie
Source :
Journal of Clinical Medicine. Aug2024, Vol. 13 Issue 15, p4439. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Retained products of conception after childbirth or miscarriage are associated with an increased rate of maternal complications, such as abnormal vaginal bleeding and infections. Late complications may also include intrauterine adhesions, causing infertility. Surgical interventions carry a certain risk. Thus, conservative management is often discussed as an alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with retained products of conception, comparing a primary surgical approach to conservative management. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 88 patients diagnosed with retained products of conception after 23+0 weeks of gestation at the Medical University Vienna between 2014 and 2022. Results: Forty-seven (53.4%) patients underwent primary surgical management and 41 (46.6%) primary conservative management. After primary conservative treatment, a complication could be observed in 10 (24.4%) women. In contrast, complications occurred in 32 (68.1%) women in the group with primary surgical treatment (p < 0.001). The most common complication in both groups was the ongoing suspicion of retained products of conception. Patients after primary surgical treatment were significantly more likely to require a secondary change in treatment (p < 0.001). Ultimately, secondary conservative management was applied in 30 (63.8%) patients. In contrast, only nine (21.95%) patients with primary conservative management required secondary surgical management. Conclusions: Due to the high risk of complications and persistent retained products of conception, primary surgical management should only be prioritized in hemodynamically instable or septic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20770383
Volume :
13
Issue :
15
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178947924
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154439