Combined value of interictal markers and stimulated seizures to estimate the seizure onset zone in stereoelectroencephalography.

Objective Methods Results Significance This study was undertaken to investigate the potential of interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) findings and electrically stimulated seizures during stereo‐EEG (SEEG) as surrogate markers for the spontaneous seizure onset zone (spSOZ). We hypothesized that combining the localizing information of these markers would allow clinically meaningful estimation of the spSOZ.We included all patients (n = 63) who underwent SEEG between January 2013 and March 2020 at Helsinki University Hospital and had spontaneous seizures during the recording. We scored spikes, gamma activity, and background abnormality on each channel visually during a 12‐h epoch containing waking state and sleep. Based on semiology, we classified stimulated seizures as typical or atypical/unclassifiable and estimated the stimulated SOZ (stimSOZ) for typical seizures. To assess which markers increased the odds of channel inclusion in the spSOZ, we fitted mixed effects logistic regression models.A combined regression model including the stimSOZ and interictal markers scored during sleep performed better in estimating which channels were part of the spSOZ than models based on stimSOZ (p < .001) or interictal markers (p < .001) alone. Of the individual markers, the effect sizes were greatest for inclusion of a channel in the stimSOZ (odds ratio [OR] = 60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 37–97, p < .001) and for continuous (OR = 25, 95% CI = 12–55, p < .001) and subcontinuous (OR = 36, 95% CI = 21–64, p < .001) interictal spiking. At the individual level, the model's accuracy to predict spSOZ inclusion varied markedly (median accuracy = 85.7, range = 54.4–100), which was not explained by etiology (p > .05).Compared to either marker alone, combining visually rated interictal SEEG markers and stimulated seizures improved prediction of which SEEG channels belonged to the spSOZ. Inclusion in the stimSOZ and continuous or subcontinuous spikes increased the odds of spSOZ inclusion the most. Future studies should investigate whether suboptimal sampling of the true epileptogenic zone can explain the model's poor performance in certain patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]