Comparative energy and exergy analysis of ortho-para hydrogen and non-ortho-para hydrogen conversion in hydrogen liquefaction.

This study reports the comparative energy and exergy analysis of ortho-para hydrogen and non-ortho-para hydrogen conversion in hydrogen liquefaction process. Two cases were simulated, case A – hydrogen liquefaction with ortho-parahydrogen conversion and case B – hydrogen liquefaction without ortho-parahydrogen conversion. This is the first study that presents a comparative energy and exergy analysis between such two cases. In this research, a hydrogen liquefaction process was designed adopting cascaded five-stage Brayton refrigeration cycle. The process was simulated in Aspen PLUS. The process used a mixed refrigerant (of liquefied natural gas) refrigeration cycle to precool the gaseous hydrogen feed from 26 °C temperature to −192 °C temperature, and mixed refrigerant (of nelium) was subsequently used to further deep-cool the the hydrogen stream from −192 °C temperature to −245.99 °C temperature in the cryogenic section of the process. Liquefaction was achieved by expanding the hydrogen through Joule-Thomson valve at −248.37 °C and 1 bar. The simulated results of the two cases showed the specific energy consumption of case A to be 8.45 kWhr/kg LH , and that of case B to be 15.65 kWhr/kg LH respectively. The results also indicated a total exergy efficiency of 92.42% in case A and 87.18% in case B. The research results showed that the hydrogen liquefaction designed with configuration of ortho-parahydrogen conversion has better performance indicators than the liquefaction without ortho-parahydrogen conversion. Therefore, hydrogen liquefaction with ortho-parahydrogen conversion can be considered in the design and development of new hydrogen liquefaction plants. Process optimization is recommended to further enhance the specific energy consumption and exergy efficiency of both processes. • Comparative analysis of ortho-para and non-ortho-para hydrogen conversion. • Ortho-para Process is more energy efficient than non-ortho-para process. • Average exergy efficiency of 89.8% achieved in the analysed processes. • Integration of three refrigeration cycles to achieve hydrogen liquefaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]