Back to Search Start Over

Scintillation Imaging Dosimetry for High-Temporal Resolution Error Detection During UHDR Proton Beam Delivery.

Authors :
Clark, M.
Harms, J.
Vasyltsiv, R.
Gladstone, D.J.
Kraus, J.
Zhang, R.
Bruza, P.
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2024 Supplement, Vol. 120 Issue 2, pS140-S141. 2p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

In-vivo beam monitoring will be necessary for safe clinical translation of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) proton therapy. Although there is no perfect detector for this extreme radiation environment, scintillation imaging dosimetry (SID) has shown promise for accurate dose and dose rate measurements at UHDR timescales. In this study we characterize the noise resolution of an SID system during delivery of modulated UHDR PBS proton, showcasing its utility as an online error-prevention tool. Delivery of complex, 250 MeV UHDR PBS treatment plans with PBS dose rates above 65Gy/s at treatment isocenter were designed with an in-house planning script. A set of pre-defined delivery errors were added to both simple, square-field plans, and complex plans designed for SBRT in the lungs. Spot intensity errors from 1-5% per spot and spot displacements from 1-3 mm were randomly inserted into plans. Surface dose images were collected at 4.5 kHz/0.23 mm resolution during delivery of the planned beams via an intensified CMOS camera facing a block of solid with a top scintillation layer. The average spot-to-spot intensity variations for uniform fields was 2.5+/-0.4% and spot positioning accuracy was 0.49 ± 0.15mm. In uniform fields with planned delivery errors, the SID was able to detect spot MU intensity changes of 5%, measuring 2% differences in dose, which agreed with the planned dose distribution, and spot position changes as low as 1 mm were seen on imaging. For the modulated fields, spot intensity errors as low as 2% were detected, and planned spot position errors of 0.5mm were detected. Of note, imaged dose and dose rate maps showed strong agreement between simulation and imaging, with average gamma passings rate of 98% and 99%, respectively, at 3%/2 mm. In this study, an SID was shown to be able to detect single-spot intensity errors as low as 5%, offering higher sensitivity than gamma analysis. Additionally, the proposed technique allows for monitoring dose-time profiles, potentially alerting the user if an in-delivery error has occurred in real time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
120
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179875275
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.255