Assessing the Operational Characteristics of the Individual Causal Association as a Metric of Surrogacy in the Binary Continuous Setting.

ABSTRACT In a causal inference framework, a new metric has been proposed to quantify surrogacy for a continuous putative surrogate and a binary true endpoint, based on information theory. The proposed metric, termed the individual causal association (ICA), was quantified using a joint causal inference model for the corresponding potential outcomes. Due to the non‐identifiability inherent in this type of models, a sensitivity analysis was introduced to study the behavior of the ICA as a function of the non‐identifiable parameters characterizing the aforementioned model. In this scenario, to reduce uncertainty, several plausible yet untestable assumptions like monotonicity, independence, conditional independence or homogeneous variance–covariance, are often incorporated into the analysis. We assess the robustness of the methodology regarding these simplifying assumptions via simulation. The practical implications of the findings are demonstrated in the analysis of a randomized clinical trial evaluating an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]