Back to Search Start Over

Remote monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis (REMORA): study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial and process evaluation of an integrated symptom tracking intervention.

Authors :
van der Veer, Sabine N.
Griffiths-Jones, Deb
Parkes, Matthew
Druce, Katie L.
Amlani-Hatcher, Paul
Armitage, Christopher J.
Bansback, Nicholas
Bower, Peter
Dowding, Dawn
Ellis, Benjamin
Firth, Jill
Gavan, Sean
Mackey, Elaine
Sanders, Caroline
Sharp, Charlotte A.
Staniland, Karen
Dixon, William G.
Source :
Trials. 10/15/2024, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-20. 20p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) relies on symptoms reported by patients during infrequent outpatient clinic visits. These reports are often incomplete and inaccurate due to poor recall, leading to suboptimal treatment decisions and outcomes. Asking people to track symptoms in-between visits and integrating the data into clinical pathways may improve this. However, knowledge on how to implement this into practice and its impact on services and outcomes remains scarce in RA. Therefore, we evaluate the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of integrated symptom tracking in people with RA over and above usual care, while generating insights on factors for successful implementation. Methods: In this superiority stepped wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial with continuous recruitment short exposure design, 16 rheumatology outpatient departments (clusters) recruit a total of 732 people with active RA. They initially offer clinic visits according to standard of care before switching in pairs to visits with integrated symptom tracking. Clusters switch in randomized order every 3 weeks. Integrated symptom tracking consists of (1) a mobile app for patients to track their symptoms daily and other RA aspects weekly/monthly, and (2) an interactive dashboard visualizing the app data, which healthcare professionals access from their electronic health record system. Clinic visits happen according to usual practice, with tracked symptom data only reviewed during visits. Our primary outcome is a difference in marginal mean disease activity score at 12 ± 3 months between standard of care and integrated symptom tracking, after accounting for baseline values, cluster, and other covariates. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported disease activity, quality of life and quality-adjusted life-years, medication/resource use, consultation and decision-making experience, self-management, and illness perception. We also conduct interviews and observations as part of a parallel process evaluation to gather information on implementation. Discussion: Our trial will generate high-quality evidence of comparative and cost-effectiveness of integrated symptom tracking compared to standard of care in people with RA, with our process evaluation delivering knowledge on successful implementation. This optimizes the chances of integrated symptom tracking being adopted more widely if we find it is (cost-) effective. Trial registration: Registered 4-Jun-2024 on https://www.isrctn.com/, ISRCTN51539448. Trial open science framework repository: https://osf.io/sj9ha/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17456215
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180268606
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08497-9