Back to Search Start Over

Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System: Initial Experience at a High-Volume Robotic Centre.

Authors :
Scarcia, Marcello
Filomena, Giovanni Battista
Moretto, Stefano
Marino, Filippo
Cotrufo, Simone
Francocci, Alessandra
Maselli, Francesco Paolo
Cardo, Giuseppe
Pagliarulo, Giovanni
Rizzo, Pierluigi
Russo, Pierluigi
Di Dio, Michele
Alba, Stefano
Calbi, Roberto
Romano, Michele
Zazzara, Michele
Ludovico, Giuseppe Mario
Source :
Journal of Clinical Medicine. Oct2024, Vol. 13 Issue 19, p5916. 12p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (Hugo™ RAS) system represents a novel advancement in robotic surgical technology. Despite this, there remains a scarcity of data regarding extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) using this system. Methods: We conducted a prospective study at Ospedale Regionale "F. Miulli" from June 2023 to January 2024, enrolling consecutive patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing eRARP ± lymph node dissection. All procedures employed a modular four-arm setup performed by two young surgeons with limited prior robotic surgery experience. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of eRARP using the Hugo™ RAS system, reporting comprehensive preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes in the largest reported cohort to date. Results: A total of 50 cases were analyzed, with a mean patient age of 65.76 (±5.57) years. The median operative time was 275 min (Q1–Q3 150–345), and the console time was 240 min (Q1–Q3 150–300). The docking time averaged 10 min (Q1–Q3 6–20). There were no intraoperative complications recorded. Two major complications occurred within the first 90 days. At the 3-month mark, 36 patients (72%) achieved undetectable PSA levels (<0.1 ng/mL). Social continence was achieved by 66% of patients, while 40% maintained erectile function. Conclusions: eRARP utilizing the Hugo™ RAS system demonstrated effectiveness and safety in our study cohort. However, more extensive studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are necessary to thoroughly evaluate long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20770383
Volume :
13
Issue :
19
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180274032
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195916