Back to Search Start Over

Prognosis of Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Kidney Injury Who Initiate Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors :
Diaz, Paige McLean
Saly, Danielle L.
Horick, Nora
Petrosyan, Romela
Gitto, Zachary
Indriolo, Teresa
Li, Lucinda
Kahn-Boesel, Olivia
Donlan, John
Robinson, Blair
Dow, Lindsay
Liu, Annie
El-Jawahri, Areej
Parada, Xavier Vela
Combs, Sara
Teixeira, Joao
Chung, Raymond
Allegretti, Andrew S.
Ufere, Nneka N.
Source :
Digestive Diseases & Sciences. Oct2024, Vol. 69 Issue 10, p3710-3720. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Data to guide dialysis decision-making for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis are lacking. Aims: We aimed to describe the processes, predictors, and outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis at a single liver transplantation center. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study of a retrospective cohort of 372 transplant-ineligible inpatients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) between 2008 and 2015. We performed survival analyses to evaluate 6-month survival and renal recovery and examined end-of-life care outcomes. We used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize processes leading to RRT initiation. Results: We identified 266 (71.5%) patients who received RRT and 106 (28.5%) who did not receive RRT (non-RRT). Median survival was 12.5 days (RRT) vs. 2.0 days (non-RRT) (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.28–0.46); 6-month survival was 15% (RRT) vs. 0% (non-RRT). RRT patients were more likely to die in the intensive care unit (88% vs. 32%, p < 0.001). HRS-AKI patients were more likely to be RRT dependent at 6 months than ATN patients (86% vs. 27%, p = 0.007). The most common reasons for RRT initiation were unclear etiology of AKI on presentation (32%) and belief of likely reversibility of ATN (82%). Conclusion: Most transplant-ineligible patients who were initiated on RRT experienced very short-term mortality and received intensive end-of-life care. However, approximately 1 in 6 were alive at 6 months. Our findings underscore the critical need for structured clinical processes to support high-quality serious illness communication and RRT decision-making for this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01632116
Volume :
69
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Digestive Diseases & Sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180368983
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08623-2