Back to Search Start Over

Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry Using a Matrix Corrected Fundamental Parameters Algorithm vs. Acid Digestion with ICP-AES: A Comparison of Two Methods for Soil Elemental Analysis.

Authors :
Lee, Christopher
Monteith, Steve
Ferguson, Richard
Seybold, Cathy
Source :
Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis. Oct2024, p1-15. 15p. 2 Illustrations.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (ED-XRF) is evaluated as an alternative to conventional acid-mediated soil digestion methods for analysis of aluminum (Al), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), phosphorus (P), silicon (Si), strontium (Sr), titanium (Ti), and zirconium (Zr). The Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory (KSSL) currently uses microwave-assisted digestion with inductively coupled plasma – atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) to measure the 12 elements (Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, Si, Sr, Ti, Zr). The equipment needed to conduct the digestion method is expensive, the materials are hazardous, and the method is laborious. The Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory (KSSL) has observed variable elemental recoveries for certain elements. The objective of the study was to evaluate an ED-XRF method as an alternative to the KSSL digestion method. The literature offers few examples of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) method development and validation. The candidate ED-XRF method offered a more efficient, less expensive, and less hazardous approach for measuring the 12 elements. Relative to the digestion method, the candidate ED-XRF method showed improved precision and accuracy for specific elements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00103624
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180451982
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2024.2418956