Back to Search Start Over

Best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delay distributions of infectious diseases.

Authors :
Charniga, Kelly
Park, Sang Woo
Akhmetzhanov, Andrei R.
Cori, Anne
Dushoff, Jonathan
Funk, Sebastian
Gostic, Katelyn M.
Linton, Natalie M.
Lison, Adrian
Overton, Christopher E.
Pulliam, Juliet R. C.
Ward, Thomas
Cauchemez, Simon
Abbott, Sam
Source :
PLoS Computational Biology. 10/28/2024, Vol. 20 Issue 10, p1-21. 21p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Epidemiological delays are key quantities that inform public health policy and clinical practice. They are used as inputs for mathematical and statistical models, which in turn can guide control strategies. In recent work, we found that censoring, right truncation, and dynamical bias were rarely addressed correctly when estimating delays and that these biases were large enough to have knock-on impacts across a large number of use cases. Here, we formulate a checklist of best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delays. We also provide a flowchart to guide practitioners based on their data. Our examples are focused on the incubation period and serial interval due to their importance in outbreak response and modeling, but our recommendations are applicable to other delays. The recommendations, which are based on the literature and our experience estimating epidemiological delay distributions during outbreak responses, can help improve the robustness and utility of reported estimates and provide guidance for the evaluation of estimates for downstream use in transmission models or other analyses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1553734X
Volume :
20
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
PLoS Computational Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180522141
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012520