VELOcities of CEpheids (VELOCE): II. Systematic search for spectroscopic binary cepheids.

Classical Cepheids provide valuable insights into the evolution of stellar multiplicity among intermediate-mass stars. Here, we present a systematic investigation of single-lined spectroscopic binaries (SB1s) based on high-precision velocities measured by the VELOcities of CEpheids (VELOCE) project. We detected 76 (29%) SB1 systems among the 258 Milky Way Cepheids in the first VELOCE data release, 32 (43%) of which were not previously known to be SB1 systems. We determined 30 precise and three tentative orbital solutions, 18 (53%) of which are reported for the first time. This large set of Cepheid orbits provides a detailed view of the eccentricity e and orbital period Porb distribution among evolved intermediate-mass stars, ranging from e ∈ [0.0, 0.8] and Porb ∈ [240, 9000] d. The orbital motion on timescales exceeding the 11 yr VELOCE baseline was investigated using a template-fitting technique applied to literature data. Particularly interesting objects include (a) R Cru, the Cepheid with the shortest orbital period in the Milky Way (∼238 d); (b) ASAS J103158−5814.7, a short-period overtone Cepheid exhibiting time-dependent pulsation amplitudes as well as orbital motion; and (c) 17 triple systems with outer visual companions, among other interesting objects. Most VELOCE Cepheids (21/23) that exhibit evidence of a companion based on a Gaia proper motion anomaly are also spectroscopic binaries, whereas the remaining do not exhibit significant (> 3σ) orbital radial velocity variations. Gaia quality flags, notably the renormalized unit weight error (RUWE), do not allow Cepheid binaries to be identified reliably although statistically the average RUWE of SB1 Cepheids is slightly higher than that of non-SB1 Cepheids. A comparison with Gaia photometric amplitudes in G-, Bp, and Rp also does not allow one to identify spectroscopic binaries among the full VELOCE sample, indicating that the photometric amplitudes in this wavelength range are not sufficiently informative of companion stars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]