Comparative Strength Study of Indirect Permanent Restorations: 3D-Printed, Milled, and Conventional Dental Composites.

MLA

Tribst, João Paulo Mendes, et al. “Comparative Strength Study of Indirect Permanent Restorations: 3D-Printed, Milled, and Conventional Dental Composites.” Clinics & Practice, vol. 14, no. 5, Oct. 2024, pp. 1940–52. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050154.

APA

Tribst, J. P. M., Veerman, A., Pereira, G. K. R., Kleverlaan, C. J., & Dal Piva, A. M. de O. (2024). Comparative Strength Study of Indirect Permanent Restorations: 3D-Printed, Milled, and Conventional Dental Composites. Clinics & Practice, 14(5), 1940–1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050154

Chicago

Tribst, João Paulo Mendes, Adelheid Veerman, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, and Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva. 2024. “Comparative Strength Study of Indirect Permanent Restorations: 3D-Printed, Milled, and Conventional Dental Composites.” Clinics & Practice 14 (5): 1940–52. doi:10.3390/clinpract14050154.