Back to Search Start Over

Comparative evaluation of early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam versus ceftazidime/avibactam for non-COVID-19 patients with pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors :
Lodise, Thomas P
Obi, Engels N
Watanabe, Alexandre H
Yucel, Emre
Min, Jae
Nathanson, Brian H
Source :
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC). Nov2024, Vol. 79 Issue 11, p2954-2964. 11p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are commonly used in patients with MDR- Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) pneumonia (PNA). This study compared outcomes between non-COVID-19 hospitalized patients with MDR-PSA PNA who received ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam. Methods The study included non-COVID-19 adult hospitalized patients with MDR-PSA PNA in the PINC AI Healthcare Database (2016–22) who received ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam within 3 days of index culture for ≥2 days. Outcomes were mortality, recurrent MDR-PSA PNA, discharge destination, post-index culture day length of stay (LOS) and costs (in US dollars, USD), and hospital readmission. Results The final sample included 197 patients (117 ceftolozane/tazobactam, 80 ceftazidime/avibactam). No significant differences were observed in mortality and post-index culture LOS and costs between groups. In the multivariable analyses, patients who received ceftolozane/tazobactam versus ceftazidime/avibactam had lower recurrent MDR-PSA PNA (7.9% versus 18.0%, P  = 0.03) and 60 day PNA-related readmissions (11.1% versus 28.5%, P  = 0.03) and were more likely to be discharged home (25.8% versus 9.8%, P  = 0.03). Compared with ceftazidime/avibactam patients, ceftolozane/tazobactam patients had lower adjusted median total antibiotic costs (5052 USD versus 8099 USD, P  = 0.003) and lower adjusted median comparator (ceftolozane/tazobactam or ceftazidime/avibactam) antibiotic costs (3938 USD versus 6441 USD, P  = 0.005). In the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysis, a ceftolozane/tazobactam-treated patient was more likely to have a more favourable outcome than a ceftazidime/avibactam-treated patient [DOOR probability: 59.6% (95% CI: 52.5%–66.8%)]. Conclusions Early treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam may offer some clinical and cost benefits over ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with MDR-PSA PNA. Further large-scale studies are necessary to comprehensively understand the outcomes associated with these treatments for MDR-PSA PNA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03057453
Volume :
79
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180625957
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae313