Back to Search Start Over

IPEM topical report: the first UK survey of cone beam CT dose indices in radiotherapy verification imaging for adult patients.

Authors :
Wood, Tim J
Davis, Anne T
Earley, James
Edyvean, Sue
Findlay, Una
Lindsay, Rebecca
Plaistow, Rosaleen
Williams, Matthew
Source :
Physics in Medicine & Biology. 11/21/2024, Vol. 69 Issue 22, p1-15. 15p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Cone beam CT is integral to most modern radiotherapy treatments. The application of daily and repeat CBCT imaging can lead to high imaging doses over a large volume of tissue that extends beyond the treatment site. Hence, it is important to ensure exposures are optimised to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable, whilst ensuring images are suitable for the clinical task. This IPEM topical report presents the results of the first UK survey of dose indices in radiotherapy CBCT. Dose measurements, as defined by the cone beam dose index (CBDIw), were collected along with protocol information for seven treatment sites. Where a range of optimised protocols were available in a centre, a sample of patient data demonstrating the variation in protocol use were requested. Protocol CBDIw values were determined from the average dosimetry data for each type of linear accelerator, and median CBDIw and scan length were calculated for each treatment site at each centre. Median CBDIw values were compared and summary statistics derived that enable the setting of national dose reference levels (DRLs). A total of 63 UK radiotherapy centres contributed data. The proposed CBDIw DRLs are; prostate 20.6 mGy, gynaecological 20.8 mGy, breast 5.0 mGy, 3D-lung 6.0 mGy, 4D-lung 11.8 mGy, brain 3.5 mGy and head/neck 4.2 mGy. However, large differences between models of imaging system were noted. Where centres had pro-active optimisation strategies in place, such as sized based protocols with selection criteria, dose reductions on the 'average' patient were possible compared with vendor defaults. Optimisation of scan length was noted in some clinical sites, with Elekta users tending to fit different collimators for prostate imaging (relatively short) compared with gynaecological treatments (longest). This contrasts with most Varian users who apply the default scan length in most cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00319155
Volume :
69
Issue :
22
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Physics in Medicine & Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180700472
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad88d1