Back to Search Start Over

Fate of emerging contaminants in an advanced SBR wastewater treatment and reuse facility incorporating UF, RO, and UV processes.

Authors :
Bhattacharjee, Sourjya
Oussadou, Samy Elhadi
Mousa, Muath
Shabib, Ahmad
Semerjian, Lucy
Semreen, Mohammad H.
Almanassra, Ismail W.
Atieh, Muataz Ali
Shanableh, Abdallah
Source :
Water Research. Dec2024, Vol. 267, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

• ECs tracked over 6 months in wastewater reuse facility with SBR, UF, RO, UV. • UHPLC-QTOF-MS used to detect >400 ECs and quantify 17 ECs. • SBR plant showed variable removals from 4 % to 99 %, while UF had limited efficacy. • RO decreased most ECs to <1 ng/L, but UV disinfection caused some rebound. • Important to optimize treatment train and monitor ECs in water reuse facilities. A critical factor for widescale water reuse adoption is the capability of advanced wastewater treatment facilities to consistently produce high-quality water by efficiently removing various pollutants, including emerging contaminants (ECs). This study monitored the fate of seventeen ECs (which included pesticides, antibiotics and other pharmaceutically active compounds) over six months in an advanced wastewater reuse facility situated in the United Arab Emirates. The facility integrates a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) based sewage treatment plant (STP) with a water recycling facility featuring ultrafiltration (UF), reverse osmosis (RO), and ultraviolet (UV) disinfection. ECs were detected and quantified at the influent and effluents of the various treatment stages, using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS). The STP exhibited variable removal efficiencies, achieving >90 % removal for compounds like caffeine and acetaminophen, while others, such as carbamazepine and thiabendazole, displayed poor removal (<10 %). UF treatment broadly resulted in limited removal, with ECs in permeate typically persisting in the 1–10 ng/L range. Subsequently, after undergoing RO treatment, eight ECs were still detected in the RO permeate, albeit at <1 ng/L, except for imidacloprid (2.5 ng/L). Conversely, the final UV disinfection step led to concentration increases of certain ECs, namely imidacloprid, thiabendazole, sulfamethoxazole, sulfamethazine and caffeine. Overall, the total EC concentration levels decreased considerably from 2300 ng/L in the STP influent to 5.2 ng/L in the RO permeate. However, a subsequent increase to 27.5 ng/L was observed after UV disinfection. While the study underscores the effectiveness of advanced treatment processes, notably RO, in reducing EC concentrations, it also demonstrates the importance of continuous EC monitoring in such facilities as many compounds persist post treatment. Additionally, the potential for processes like UV disinfection to increase certain EC concentrations highlights the need to optimize treatment trains to minimize EC concentration rebound. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00431354
Volume :
267
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Water Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181033807
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122518