Back to Search Start Over

Best Evidence Summary for the Prevention of Pressure Injuries in Orthopaedic Patients.

Authors :
Zhou, Liqiong
Hu, Yinfeng
Ma, Dan
Ren, Bowen
Cui, Juan
Zhou, Qian
Wang, Meiyi
Li, Juan
Zhang, Peilan
Qi, Xiaoxuan
Source :
Journal of Clinical Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Dec2024, Vol. 33 Issue 12, p4651-4664. 14p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aim: To systematically search, evaluate and synthesise the most robust evidence regarding pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients admitted to general wards. Design: The present study provides an evidence‐based summary of the most robust findings, adhering to the evidence guidelines established by the Center for Evidence‐Based Nursing of Fudan University. Method: According to the "6S" model, a systematic search was conducted for literature on pressure injury prevention among orthopaedic patients in general wards. The types of literature included guidelines, clinical decisions, expert Consensus, evidence summaries, etc. The search period covered the time from the beginning of the database up to December 2023. Data Source s : The following databases and resources were systematically searched: Up To Date, JBI, NICE, WOCN, NZWCS, etc. Results: Fifteen literature sources were included, comprising one clinical decision, eight guidelines, one systematic review, and one expert Consensus. In these sources, a comprehensive collection of 34 pieces of best evidence was formed across six key topics: risk assessment, position management, skin care, device used for device‐related pressure injury, nutritional assessment, and support, as well as health education and training. Among the evidence gathered, a strong recommendation was made for 18 pieces, while the remaining 16 received a weak recommendation. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the most robust evidence on pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients, encompassing 34 pieces of evidence that can serve as valuable references for clinical practice. Before implementing this evidence, it is crucial to evaluate the specific contextual factors within different countries and medical institutions, as well as the facilitators and barriers influencing its application by healthcare professionals and patient's preferences. Furthermore, targeted evidence selection should be conducted through careful screening and subsequent adjustments in implementation, thereby offering a more scientifically grounded basis for clinical nursing practice. Future research endeavours should prioritise investigating strategies for effective evidence utilisation. Implications for the Profession and Patient Care: The prevention of pressure injuries poses a significant challenge for orthopaedic patients. This study presents a synthesis of 34 pieces of best evidence to provide guidance on preventive measures for pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients. Adhering to and implementing these 34 pieces of evidence can effectively aid in preventing pressure injuries in clinical practice. This evidence encompasses risk assessment, position management, skin care, device usage for device‐related pressure injuries, nutritional support and evaluation, and health education and training, establishing a comprehensive and systematic implementation process. Assessing the risk of pressure injuries during interventions serves as an essential prerequisite for developing effective strategies to prevent such injuries among orthopaedic patients. Ultimately, this study will offer valuable guidance to healthcare professionals worldwide regarding preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients. Impact: Upon admission to the hospital, it is essential to conduct a risk assessment and implement evidence‐based, individualised prevention measures for pressure ulcers in patients to prevent their occurrence. This study will provide valuable insights into preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients admitted to orthopaedic wards for healthcare workers worldwide. State: The PRIMA manifest is utilised during the text preparation process. Trail Registration: ES20245365 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09621067
Volume :
33
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181058120
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17507