Back to Search
Start Over
Prophylactic PICO◊ dressing shortens wound dressing requirements post emergency laparotomy (EL-PICO◊ trial).
- Source :
-
World Journal of Emergency Surgery . 11/22/2024, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a very common complication of emergency laparotomy and causes significant morbidity. The PICO◊ device delivers negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to closed incisions, with some studies suggesting a role for prevention of SSI in heterogenous surgical populations. We aimed to compare SSI rates between patients receiving PICO◊ versus conventional dressing post-emergency laparotomy. Secondary objectives were to observe seroma and dehiscence rates, length of stay, days on dressing and patients' wound experience. Methods: This double blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in University Malaya Medical Centre between October 2019 and March 2022. Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy requiring incisions less than 35 cm were included. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 test for categorical variables, independent T-test or Mann–Whitney U were used for parametric or non-parametric data respectively besides logistic regression. P values of < 0.05 were considered to be significant. Results: Ninety-six patients were analyzed (47 interventions, 49 controls). The duration on dressing was more consistent in the intervention arm (PICO◊) versus control arm [9.78 ± 10.20 vs 17.78 ± 16.46 days, P < 0.001]. There was a trend towards lower SSI [14.3 vs 4.3%, P = 0.09], dehiscence [27.1 vs 10.6%, P = 0.07] and seroma [40.8 vs 23.4%, P = 0.08] rates in the intervention arm but this did not reach statistical significance. Length of stay [9 (IQR: 6–14) vs 11 (IQR: 6–22.5) days, P = 0.18] was fairly similar between the two arms, but more patients were very satisfied with PICO◊ compared to the conventional dressing [80% vs 57.1%, P = 0.03]. Conclusion: The use of NPWT in emergency laparotomy improves patients wound care experience, and was associated with trends towards fewer wound related complications. Cost effectiveness needs to be explored in order to further validate its use in the emergency setting, especially for patients with additional risk for SSI. Trial registration National Medical Research Registry (NMRR): NMRR-20-1975-55222. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *SURGICAL wound dehiscence
*RESEARCH funding
*ACADEMIC medical centers
*T-test (Statistics)
*BANDAGES & bandaging
*ABDOMINAL surgery
*STATISTICAL sampling
*BLIND experiment
*PARAMETERS (Statistics)
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*PROBABILITY theory
*FISHER exact test
*EMERGENCY medical services
*PREOPERATIVE care
*TREATMENT duration
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*CHI-squared test
*MANN Whitney U Test
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*NEGATIVE-pressure wound therapy
*MATHEMATICAL statistics
*SURGICAL dressings
*WOUND care
*SURGICAL site infections
*INFLAMMATION
*LENGTH of stay in hospitals
*COMPARATIVE studies
*DATA analysis software
*PATIENTS' attitudes
*NONPARAMETRIC statistics
PREVENTION of surgical complications
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17497922
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- World Journal of Emergency Surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 181068658
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00560-9