Back to Search
Start Over
Sociologists and subjectivity revisited.
- Source :
-
British Journal of Sociology . Sep2005, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p493-498. 6p. - Publication Year :
- 2005
-
Abstract
- This article responds to M. Bittman and J. Pixley's paper "Equality and Gender, Divided Versus Multiple Subjectivity: A Response to Allon J. Uhlmann's The Sociology of Subjectivity, and Subjectivity of Sociologists" in volume 55, issue number 3 of the "British Journal of Sociology." The criticism of Bittman and Pixley's book "The Double Life of the Family" focused on a number of selected texts in order to expose some of the analytical dynamics that prevail in the sociology of the Australian family. The book served as an example of a class-unconscious discussion of the family. It was argued that the book overlook systemic differences in subjectivity across class and gender, and did not consider the sociological significance of the variation in the contexts in which members of different classes lead their lives. Bittman and Pixley's response skirts the main issues which have been the focus of the critique.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00071315
- Volume :
- 56
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- British Journal of Sociology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 18165358
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00079.x