Impact of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Enzyme Activity in Neuroendocrine Tumors.

<bold><italic>Introduction:</italic></bold> Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) converts L-tryptophan (T) to L-kynurenine (K) resulting in an immunosuppressive microenvironment. The aim of the current study was to evaluate in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (1) T and K concentrations; (2) correlation with clinical outcome; (3) relationship between IDO activity and inflammatory cytokines. <bold><italic>Methods:</italic></bold> A cross-sectional study was performed to investigate the IDO pathway in patients in follow-up for NET. Clinicopathological features, serum levels of K and T through liquid chromatography, and serum assay of cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-22, IL-23, TNF-α) through MAGPIX were evaluated. <bold><italic>Results:</italic></bold> Seventy-eight NET patients were enrolled (66 lung, 12 pancreatic): 69.2% were in postoperative remission, 14.1% in stable disease, and 16.7% in disease progression. T was significantly lower in patients older than 65 years (<italic>p</italic> = 0.003). K and T were significantly lower in patients with progression (<italic>p</italic> = 0.03, <italic>p</italic> = 0.004, respectively). T was an independent predictor factor of progression in multivariable analysis (<italic>p</italic> = 0.041). A cutoff of 7.74 μg/mL significantly differentiates patients with progression and those with stable disease. IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly associated with tumor progression in univariate analysis (<italic>p</italic> = 0.005, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001, respectively) but not in the multivariable analysis. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between T and IL-10 (<italic>r</italic> = −0.366, <italic>p</italic> value = 0.04). <bold><italic>Conclusion:</italic></bold> The K/T pathway may play a role as a potential predictor of tumor progression in NET. These findings need to be validated in large prospective studies investigating its metabolites as both prognostic and predictive factors for treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]