Trinko v. Baxter: The demise of U.S. v. AT&T.

The article criticizes the Supreme Court's decision on the case "Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko LLP." The author argues that by relying on faulty assumptions about the regulated industry limits the scope of antitrust enforcement. He also asserts that the decision contradicts both the outcome in the case "United States v. AT&T" and the theory on which that case rested.