Serial Processing Is Consistent With the Time Course of Linguistic Information Extraction From Consecutive Words During Eye Fixations in Reading: A Response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005).

A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach (2005) reported the results of 2 experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader model). In this reply, the authors demonstrate via argumentation and simulations that their data pose no serious problem for the E-Z Reader model or serial attention models in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]