Back to Search Start Over

Airway topicalisation in morbidly obese patients using atomised lidocaine: 2% compared with 4%.

Authors :
Wieczorek, P. M.
Schricker, T.
Vinet, B.
Backman, S. B.
Source :
Anaesthesia. Oct2007, Vol. 62 Issue 10, p984-988. 5p. 2 Charts, 3 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

We evaluated the technique of airway anaesthesia using atomised lidocaine for awake oral fibreoptic intubation in morbidly obese patients using two doses of local anaesthetic. Morbidly obese patients were allocated to receive either 2% or 4% lidocaine (40 ml) for oral airway anaesthesia using an atomiser with high oxygen flow. Patients were carefully sedated using midazolam and fentanyl. Outcomes included patient tolerance to airway manipulation, haemodynamic parameters, and serial plasma lidocaine concentrations. In all, 27 patients were enrolled in the study (2% cohort n = 14, 4% cohort n = 13). Patient characteristics and time for topicalisation and airway management were similar. Haemodynamic parameters did not change significantly. Tolerance to insertion of the Ovassapian airway, bronchoscopy, and tracheal tube positioning was excellent (12 vs 12 patients, 12 vs 12 patients, and 8 vs 12 patients had no response, respectively, 2% vs 4%). Differences did not reach statistical significance. Peak plasma lidocaine concentration was significantly lower in the 2% group (2.8 (0.8) μg.ml−1 compared with 6.5 (1.0) μg.ml−1, p < 0.05). Airway anaesthesia using atomised lidocaine for awake fibreoptic intubation in the morbidly obese is efficacious, rapid, and safe. Compared with 4% lidocaine, the 2% dose provides acceptable intubating conditions in most cases and produces lower plasma lidocaine levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00032409
Volume :
62
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Anaesthesia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
26463461
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05179.x