Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of US GHG cap-and-trade proposals.

Authors :
Paltsev, Sergey
Reilly, John M.
Jacoby, Henry D.
Gurcel, Angelo C.
Metcalf, Gilbert E.
Sokolov, Andrei P.
Holak, Jennifer F.
Source :
Climate Policy (Earthscan). 2008, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p395-420. 26p. 6 Charts, 7 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

In 2007 the US Congress began considering a set of bills to implement a cap-and-trade system to limit the nation's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) - and its economic component, the Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model - were used to assess these proposals. In the absence of policy, the EPPA model projects a doubling of US greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Global emissions, driven by growth in developing countries, are projected to increase even more. Unrestrained, these emissions would lead to an increase in global CO2 concentration from a current level of 380 ppmv to about 550 ppmv by 2050 and to near 900 ppmv by 2100, resulting in a year 2100 global temperature 3.5-4.5°C above the current level. The more ambitious of the Congressional proposals could limit this increase to around 2°C, but only if other nations, including developing countries, also strongly controlled greenhouse gas emissions. With these more aggressive reductions, the economic cost measured in terms of changes in total welfare in the United States could range from 1.5% to almost 2% by the 2040-2050 period, with 2015 CO2-equivalent prices between $30 and $55, rising to between $120 and $210 by 2050. This level of cost would not seriously affect US GDP growth but would imply large-scale changes in its energy system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14693062
Volume :
8
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Climate Policy (Earthscan)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34652691
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0437