Back to Search
Start Over
Do Restrictive Rules Produce Nonmedian Outcomes? A Theory with Evidence from the 101st-108th Congresses.
- Source :
-
Journal of Politics . Jan2008, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p217-231. 15p. - Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- A fundamental tenet of partisan theories of legislative organization is that the majority party is able to generate outcomes that deviate in their preferred direction from the chamber median. While these biased outcomes may be achieved through arm twisting on final passage votes, there is a more efficient means for achieving this bias: restrictive rules. While scholars have recognized this tactic as an important leadership tool in the House, its effectiveness has been often assumed but never empirically tested. We develop a theoretical model that demonstrates how the majority party can use restrictive rules to offer successful "take-it-or-leave-it" proposals to the floor median. More significantly, we test this model using DW-NOMINATE's estimated cut points of final passage roll calls in the House from the 101st to 108th Congress. Our results support the prediction of our model and suggest that majority party leaders achieve biased policy outcomes through the use of restrictive rules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00223816
- Volume :
- 70
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Politics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38604360
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080152