Back to Search Start Over

Integration of Local Ecological Knowledge and Conventional Science: a Study of Seven Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the USA.

Authors :
Ballard, Heidi L.
Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
Sturtevant, Victoria E.
Source :
Ecology & Society. 2008, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p1-22. 22p. 3 Charts.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Natural resource management decisions can be based on incomplete knowledge when they lack scientific research, monitoring, and assessment and/or simultaneously fail to draw on local ecological knowledge. Many community-based forestry organizations in the United States attempt to address these knowledge gaps with an integrated ecological stewardship approach that balances ecological, social, and economic goals. This paper examines the use and integration of local knowledge and conventional science in ecological stewardship and monitoring by seven community-based forestry demonstration projects. Through document reviews and interviews with both participants and partners of all of these communitybased organizations, we found that all the community-based forestry groups incorporated local ecological knowledge into many aspects of their management or monitoring activities, such as collaboratively designing monitoring programs with local ranchers, forest workers, and residents; involving local people in collecting data and interpreting results; and documenting the local ecological knowledge of private forest landowners, long-time residents, and harvesters of nontimber forest products. We found that all the groups also used conventional science to design or conduct ecological assessments, monitoring, or research. We also found evidence, in the form of changes in attitudes on the part of local people and conventional scientists and jointly produced reports, that the two types of knowledge were integrated by all groups. These findings imply that community-based forestry groups are redistributing the power of conventional science through the use of diverse knowledge sources. Still, several obstacles prevented some local, traditionally underrepresented groups from being significantly involved in monitoring and management decisions, and their knowledge has not yet been consistently incorporated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17083087
Volume :
13
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Ecology & Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
42408000
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02594-130237