Back to Search Start Over

Survey of Public Perceptions of Prion Disease Risks in Canada: What Does the Public Care About?

Authors :
Lemyre, L.
Gibson, S.
Markon, M. P. L.
Lee, J. E. C.
Brazeau, I.
Carroll, A.
Boutette, P.
Krewski, D.
Source :
Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health: Part A. Sep2009, Vol. 72 Issue 17/18, p1113-1121. 9p. 2 Charts, 3 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

A national public survey on public perceptions of prion disease risk in Canada was conducted from October to December 2007. The survey aimed at documenting the public's perceptions of prion diseases, within the broader context of food safety, in establishing parameters of risk acceptability. It also documented the public's perceptions of prion diseases in delineating social values and ethics that can guide Canada's future policies on prion disease risk management. In addition, the survey served to establish baseline data against which to monitor the evolution of the public's views on and understanding of this important risk issue. In total, 1517 Canadians were randomly selected to be representative of the adult population by region, age, and gender, as per the 2001 Census. This study presents descriptive findings from the survey regarding perceived risk, perceived control, uncertainty, sources of information, trust and knowledge, and beliefs pertaining to bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The survey data reveal that Canadians do not perceive mad cow disease as a salient risk but consider it more of an economic, political, social, and foreign trade issue than a public health one. Canadians are somewhat prepared to pay a premium to have a safer food supply, but not to the same extent that they desire extra measures pertaining to BSE risk management. In the context of increasing accountability in risk management decisions about food safety and population health issues, it is important to understand the way Canadians perceive such matters and identify their information needs and the factors that influence the acceptability of risks and of risk management policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15287394
Volume :
72
Issue :
17/18
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health: Part A
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
43881232
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390903084652