Back to Search Start Over

Immediate vs Delayed Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors :
Montalescot, Gilles
Cayla, Guillaume
Collet, Jean-Philippe
Elhadad, Simon
Beygui, Farzin
Breton, Hervé Le
Choussat, Rémi
Leclercq, Florence
Silvain, Johanne
Duclos, François
Aout, Mounir
Dubois-Randé, Jean-Luc
Barthélémy, Olivier
Ducrocq, Grégory
Bellemain-Appaix, Anne
Payot, Laurent
Steg, Philippe-Gabriel
Henry, Patrick
Spaulding, Christian
Vicaut, Eric
Source :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 9/2/2009, Vol. 302 Issue 9, p947-954. 8p. 4 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

The article focuses on a study which investigated if immediate intervention on admission can cause a reduction in myocardial infarction. The study included 352 patients from 13 centers in France, who were diagnosed with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. The peak troponin value during hospitalization and the composite of death were measured on each patient. Study authors compared the clinical outcome of immediate and delayed intervention. They concluded that immediate and delayed intervention showed no difference in reducing myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
302
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
43988814
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1267