Notas sobre temporalidad y transferencia.

The conceptualizations of temporality in classic Greece and the Jewish tradition and the contributions of G Deleuze and G Agamben are developed, applying them to the comprehension of a non-chronological temporality in the psychoanalytic session. The story in the session, the words of the patient must not be thought of as the comment of what happened earlier, but the story is rather the event itself as currently developed in the session while being listened by the analyst who may interpret it and then may present it because something that happens during such analysis leads him to interrogate himself, questioning himself while waiting for a reader or a listener to come. Einstein revolutionized the idea of time relating it to the idea of space and movement thus relativizing the concept. Time is neither constant nor external to us; time stops as speed increases. Regarding time, this epistemological rupture in physics has had significant repercussions in the comprehension of historical time that may no longer be thought of as mere chronology. There is a genetic temporality and a non-genetic temporality, nonsuccessive, non-numerable but rather intensive. Differences are presented between the chronology of the medical act and the intensive temporality of the analytical listening, which intensive temporality cannot be transmitted by a technological verifiable record. The resemblances between game, work of art and historicity of the living being are affirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]