Back to Search Start Over

A biophysical NPZ model with iron for the Gulf of Alaska: Reproducing the differences between an oceanic HNLC ecosystem and a classical northern temperate shelf ecosystem

Authors :
Hinckley, S.
Coyle, K.O.
Gibson, G.
Hermann, A.J.
Dobbins, E.L.
Source :
Deep-Sea Research Part II, Topical Studies in Oceanography. Nov2009, Vol. 56 Issue 24, p2520-2536. 17p.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Abstract: Modeling the coastal Gulf of Alaska (CGOA) is complicated by the highly diverse physical and biological features influencing productivity and energy flow through the region. The GOA consists of the offshore oceanic environment, characterized by iron limitation, high-nutrients and low-chlorophyll. The coastal environment is consistently downwelling, with high iron levels from glacial melt water and runoff, but lower concentrations of macronutrients, and with a spring bloom, nutrient depletion cycle (low-nutrient, high-chlorophyll). Cross-shelf movement of water masses mixes coastal and oceanic ecosystem elements. Simulations and field data indicate that the minimum model complexity necessary to characterize lower trophic-level production and biomass in the offshore and coastal regions includes 10 boxes: iron, nitrate, ammonium, small phytoplankton, large phytoplankton, small microzooplankton, large microzooplankton, small copepods, large oceanic copepods and detritus, with copepod mortality as a model closure term. We present the model structure, equations required (and initial parameters used) to simulate onshore and offshore lower trophic-level production in the Gulf of Alaska, along with the information from field data and simulations used to construct the model. We show the results of simulations with and without iron, and with and without two size classes of phytoplankton. These simulations indicate that our method of inclusion of iron works well to distinguish the coastal and the oceanic ecosystems, and that the inclusion of two size categories of phytoplankton is also necessary to generate the differences between these two ecosystems. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09670645
Volume :
56
Issue :
24
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Deep-Sea Research Part II, Topical Studies in Oceanography
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
45068164
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.03.003