Back to Search Start Over

Atomised lidocaine for airway topical anaesthesia in the morbidly obese: 1% compared with 2%.

Authors :
Woodruff, C.
Wieczorek, P. M.
Schricker, T.
Vinet, B.
Backman, S. B.
Source :
Anaesthesia. Jan2010, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p12-17. 6p. 1 Chart, 3 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Airway anaesthesia using atomised lidocaine for awake oral fibreoptic intubation in morbidly obese patients was evaluated using two doses of local anaesthetic. In this randomised, blinded prospective study, 40 ml of atomised 1% ( n = 11) or 2% ( n = 10) lidocaine was administered with high oxygen flow as carrier. Outcomes included time for intubation, patient tolerance to airway manipulation, haemodynamic parameters, the bronchoscopist’s overall satisfaction, and serial serum lidocaine concentrations. Patients receiving lidocaine 1% had a longer mean (SD) time from the start of topicalisation to tracheal tube cuff inflation than those receiving lidocaine 2% (8.6 (0.9) min vs 6.9 (0.5) min, respectively; p < 0.05). Patients in the 1% cohort demonstrated increased responses to airway manipulation (p < 0.0001), reflecting lower bronchoscopist’s satisfaction scores (p < 0.03). Haemodynamic responses to topicalisation and airway manipulation were similar in both groups. Peak plasma concentration was lower in the 1% group (mean (SD) 1.4 (0.3) and 3.8 (0.5) μg.ml−1, respectively; p < 0.001). Airway anaesthesia using atomised lidocaine for awake oral fibreoptic intubation in the morbidly obese is efficacious, rapid and safe. Compared with lidocaine 1%, the 2% dose provides superior intubating conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00032409
Volume :
65
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Anaesthesia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
45577052
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06126.x