The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record

MLA

Zegers, Marieke, et al. “The Inter-Rater Agreement of Retrospective Assessments of Adverse Events Does Not Improve with Two Reviewers per Patient Record.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 63, no. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 94–102. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.004.

APA

Zegers, M., de Bruijne, M. C., Wagner, C., Groenewegen, P. P., van der Wal, G., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.004

Chicago

Zegers, Marieke, Martine C. de Bruijne, Cordula Wagner, Peter P. Groenewegen, Gerrit van der Wal, and Henrica C.W. de Vet. 2010. “The Inter-Rater Agreement of Retrospective Assessments of Adverse Events Does Not Improve with Two Reviewers per Patient Record.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 (1): 94–102. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.004.