Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of fluorine-18 and bromine-76 imaging in positron emission tomography.

Authors :
Ribeiro, Maria João
Almeida, Pedro
Strul, Daniel
Ferreira, Nuno
Loc'h, Christian
Brulon, Vincent
Trébossen, Régine
Mazière, Bernard
Bendriem, Bernard
Source :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1999, Vol. 26 Issue 7, p758-766. 9p.
Publication Year :
1999

Abstract

State of the art positron emission tomography (PET) systems allow for scatter and attenuation correction. However, the size of the structure being studied and the region of interest (ROI) chosen also influence the accuracy of measurements of radioactive concentration. Furthermore, the limited spatial resolution of PET tomographs, which depends, among other factors, on the range of positrons in matter, can also contribute to a loss in quantitation accuracy. In this paper we address the influence of positron range, structure size and ROI size on the quantitation of radioactive concentration using PET. ECAT EXACT HR+ (HR+) and ECAT 953B/31 (ECAT 953B) PET systems were used in phantom acquisitions performed with two radioisotopes with different positron ranges. The 3D Hoffman phantom was scanned on both scanners with both radioisotopes, to visually analyse the image quality. A resolution phantom having six spheres of different diameters in a Plexiglas cylinder was used to calculate the values of the contrast recovery coefficient or hot spot recovery coefficient and of the spill-over or cold spot recovery coefficient under different imaging conditions used in clinical routine at our institution. Activity ratios were varied between 2 and 30 or between 0.4 and 200 by filling the spheres with fluorine-18 or bromine-76 respectively and the cylinder with [sup 11] C. Dynamic scans were performed on each scanner. Data were reconstructed using the same parameters as are used in clinical protocols. The variations in sphere and cylinder activities with time were fitted using the function M(t)=k[sub 1] ·A(t)+k[sub 2] .B(t), where M(t) is the radioactivity concentration measured in an ROI placed on each sphere and A(t) and B(t) represent the true radioactivity concentrations present at time t in the spheres and in the cylinder respectively. k[sub 1] and k[sub 2] are factors representing the contrast recovery coefficient and the spill-over from surrounding activity o... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03406997
Volume :
26
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
4721109
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590050447