Back to Search
Start Over
Psychology and personalism by William Stern
- Source :
-
New Ideas in Psychology . Aug2010, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p110-134. 25p. - Publication Year :
- 2010
-
Abstract
- Abstract: In 1916, shortly after his move from Breslau to Hamburg, William Stern wrote in a letter dated October 10 and addressed to his colleague and friend, the Freiburg philosopher Jonas Cohn, that the second volume of a planned three-volume series setting forth that comprehensive system of thought called ‘critical personalism’ was “essentially finished.” He wrote further that that work, in combination with a “little booklet” (Broschüre) titled Psychology and Personalism (Die Psychologie und der Personalismus) should “fashion a bridge” between his philosophical and psychological teachings. Due to a paper shortage in Germany during World War I, the larger of the two works mentioned by Stern in this letter would not actually appear until 2 years later. The “little booklet,” however, could be published sooner, and in fact appeared in 1917. What follows is a translation of that work. It sets forth the principle tenets of critical personalism in a relatively concise and accessible way, and is thus not only worthy of attention in its own right but also offers readers of this Special Issue helpful background for the papers that follow. I am very grateful to Lothar Laux and Karl-Heinz Renner for their careful reading of an earlier draft of my translation against the original publication. As native speakers of German, Laux and Renner made numerous suggestions that I gladly implemented in the interest of improving the quality of the translation. For such infelicities as remain I take full responsibility. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Subjects :
- *PSYCHOLOGY
*PERSONALISM
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0732118X
- Volume :
- 28
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- New Ideas in Psychology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 48471069
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.02.005