Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of laboratory detection methods of aspirin resistance in coronary artery disease patients.

Authors :
KIM, K. E.
WOO, K. S.
GOH, R. Y.
QUAN, M. L.
CHA, K. S.
KIM, M. H.
HAN, J. Y.
Source :
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology. Feb2010 Part ii, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p50-55. 6p. 3 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Aspirin reduces the prevalence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and death by 25.0% in high risk group of patients with cardiovascular disease. Previous studies have estimated that about 5.5–56.8% of the population are aspirin resistant. The mechanisms of aspirin resistance (AR) have not been fully understood. We compared the detection methods for AR using traditional platelet aggregometry and VerifyNow system. One hundred and seventy-two coronary artery disease patients who had taken aspirin only or combinations with aspirin and clopidogrel for over 7 days were included. Of the 55 patients with aspirin only, aggregometer detected six AR (10.9%) and VerifyNow identified 10 AR (18.2%) cases. Among 117 patients with combined therapy, none (0.0%) and 10 (8.5%) of AR were detected by aggregometer and VerifyNow, respectively. There were six (3.4%) patients of AR defined by both methods and they all received aspirin monotherapy. Although the correlation between the aggregometry and VerifyNow was low, with defined criteria both methods gave 91.9% agreement to find AR. VerifyNow showed a higher sensitivity to detect AR. Further studies are required to biologically define AR and to alter therapy based on platelet function tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17515521
Volume :
32
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
48537223
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553X.2008.01119.x