Back to Search
Start Over
COMMENTS ON PAPER BY MICHAEL A. OVERINGTON.
- Source :
-
American Sociologist . Feb79, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p17-19. 3p. - Publication Year :
- 1979
-
Abstract
- This article presents a commentary about a study by Michael A. Overington about the changes which have occurred in the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Most scientists are taught that theories will be abandoned when negative evidence is discovered. Scientists are taught that they should evaluate all new ideas even if those ideas contradict existing scientific beliefs. Parts of the work from some philosophers of science have been emphasized by a group of subjectivists who take pleasure in arguing that there is no real difference between scientific ideas and other types of ideas. Most sociologists know that what is considered to be good work depends upon a contemporary but changing consensus. Saying that there is no difference between scientific knowledge and ideology is saying that despite the beliefs of scientists, empirical evidence is of little importance in validating currently accepted scientific beliefs.
- Subjects :
- *SCIENCE & society
*PHILOSOPHY & science
*SOCIAL scientists
*SOCIOLOGISTS
*IDEOLOGY
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00031232
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- American Sociologist
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 4944786