Back to Search
Start Over
SOCIOLOGY AND HUMAN KNOWLEDGE: SCIENTIFIC VS. FOLK METHODS.
- Source :
-
American Sociologist . May81, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p119-124. 6p. - Publication Year :
- 1981
-
Abstract
- In this paper, I would like to try to sort out the conflict of two ways of knowing: on the one hand there are folk methods for constituting positive knowledge and on the other hand there are scientific methods of acquiring accurate, positive knowledge. Both methods try to solve the problem of subjectivity: privately, individually held states of knowing and understanding. In this endeavor, the very existence of social reality is at stake. If persons have, internally, states of understanding that are different from each other in any persistent and significant way, their behavior will be at cross purpose or to no human purpose and gradually behavior will drift irreconcilably apart. There are, of course, social controls by which to resynchronize behavior but in these, too, folk methods are challenged by scientific methods. I wish to emphasize that the human project requires both folk methods and scientific methods of knowledge constitution. The former could ensure collective praxis; the latter could contribute to the authentic self-knowledge of a social life world. Together they could reunite the alienated divisions of the knowledge process. I suggest some canons in the last section that may promote such reunification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *THEORY of knowledge
*SOCIOLOGY
*SCIENTIFIC method
*SOCIAL sciences
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00031232
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- American Sociologist
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 4945572