Back to Search Start Over

Investigating children's ability to reflect on stored phonological representations: the Silent Deletion of Phonemes Task.

Authors :
Claessen, Mary
Leitão, Suze
Barrett, Nick
Source :
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. Jul/Aug2010, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p411-423. 13p. 2 Illustrations, 1 Diagram, 7 Charts.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Background: The development of children's speech, language, and literacy skills is considered to build on a robust and intact speech-processing system, with normally functioning skills at all levels of input and output processing, as well as storage. There are a range of tasks available that assess input and output processing skills, however there are few tasks described in the literature that require a child to reflect on and analyse the internal structure of their own phonological representations. Aims: This paper will describe the development of the Silent Deletion of Phonemes (SDOP) task. This task is designed to assess a child's ability to delete and manipulate sounds silently within their own stored representations while minimizing the impact of any output difficulties. Methods & Procedures: The SDOP task was presented to 69 typically developing mainstream Year 2 children (aged 7;2–8;1 years) as part of a battery of phonological processing skills and literacy measures. Outcomes & Results: Scores for the population of typically developing Year 2 children were normally distributed and above a basal level but not approaching ceiling. Performance on the SDOP was significantly correlated with other measures of phonological processing but not a measure of non-verbal ability. It was most highly correlated with the measure of phonological awareness as expected, as both tasks measure awareness of the internal structure of words. However, the SDOP provided more information about the accuracy and specificity of a child's underlying phonological representations. The SDOP explained a significant amount of concurrent variance in both reading and spelling performance beyond the variance accounted for by the predictors that have been used by researchers to date. In combination, the SDOP and rapid-naming measure accounted for 58.8% of variance in performance on the reading measure and 54.4% of variance in spelling performance. Conclusions & Implications: The SDOP task appears to be a valid and reliable tool to assess the internal structure of a child's stored phonological representations. Profiling phonological representations allows clinicians to explore children's speech-processing skills which may be particularly useful with children with complex literacy difficulties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13682822
Volume :
45
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
51549786
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820903111945