Back to Search Start Over

Cyclical etidronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: efficacy and safety after seven years of treatment.

Authors :
Miller, Paul D.
Watts, Nelson B.
Licata, Angelo A.
Harris, Steven T.
Genant, Harry K.
Wasnich, Richard D.
Ross, Phillip D.
Jackson, Rebecca D.
Hoseyni, Mohammed S.
Schoenfeld, Steven L.
Valent, David J.
Chestnut III, Charles H.
Miller, P D
Watts, N B
Licata, A A
Harris, S T
Genant, H K
Wasnich, R D
Ross, P D
Jackson, R D
Source :
American Journal of Medicine. Dec97, Vol. 103 Issue 6, p468-476. 9p. 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 3 Graphs.
Publication Year :
1997

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>To determine the efficacy and safety of cyclical etidronate for up to 7 years in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and to examine the effects of discontinuing treatment after 2 or 5 years of therapy.<bold>Patients and Methods: </bold>Patients were randomized at entry into the original study in 1986 to blinded treatment for 2 years with either a calcium (placebo) or an intermittent cyclical etidronate regimen, which most patients continued for a third year. Following this phase of the study, patients were enrolled into an open-label, follow-up study (years 4 and 5), during which all patients received cyclical etidronate treatment. In the present double-blind study (years 6 and 7), patients were rerandomized to receive intermittent cyclical therapy with either etidronate or placebo; all patients received calcium. The treatment regimen consisted of 400 mg/day etidronate or placebo for 14 days, followed by 76 days of elemental calcium (500 mg/day); this cycle was repeated approximately 4 times in each year. Of the 193 patients who continued in years 6 and 7 of the study, 93 were randomized to receive cyclical etidronate and 100 were randomized to receive calcium only. For purposes of efficacy analyses, patients were categorized by their total years of cumulative etidronate treatment (7, 5, 4, or 2 years). There were 51, 46, 42, and 54 patients in the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, respectively. Annual assessments included lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by densitometry, and vertebral radiographs.<bold>Results: </bold>The groups receiving cyclical etidronate during this 2-year study period (7- and 4-year groups) had statistically significant mean percent increases in spinal BMD of 1.8% and 2.2%, respectively (P < 0.05) at the week 104 observation time. The 5- and 2-year groups, which did not receive etidronate during this period, had mean values of 1.4% and 0.2%, respectively (not significant) at week 104. In the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, the increases in spinal BMD at the end of 7 years were 7.6%, 8.6%, 8.1%, and 3.9%, respectively; these values were statistically significant for all groups compared with original baseline (year 0) (P < 0.05). BMD of the femur and wrist was maintained throughout the 7-year period. The incidence and rate of vertebral fractures were lowest in patients with the longest exposure to etidronate. Etidronate was well tolerated during the study, with low incidences of gastrointestinal side effects and nonvertebral fractures.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Long-term cyclical etidronate is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone mass is maintained for at least 2 years after treatment with etidronate is stopped; however, further gains in spinal bone mass are seen in patients who continue therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00029343
Volume :
103
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Journal of Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
51791
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00278-7