Natural history of corneal haze after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: Scheimpflug and biomicroscopic analysis

Purpose: To determine the natural history of collagen crosslinking (CXL)–associated corneal haze measured by Scheimpflug imagery and slitlamp biomicroscopy in patients with keratoconus or ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. Setting: Cornea and refractive surgery subpecialty practice, United States. Design: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Methods: The treatment group received ultraviolet-A/riboflavin CXL therapy. The control group received riboflavin alone without epithelial debridement. To objectively measure CXL-associated corneal haze, corneal densitometry using Scheimpflug imagery was measured and the changes in haze were analyzed over time. A similar analysis was performed using clinician-determined slitlamp haze. Correlation of CXL-associated corneal haze with postoperative outcomes was analyzed. Results: The mean preoperative corneal densitometry was 14.9 ± 1.93 (SD) (Pentacam Scheimpflug densitometry units). Densitometry peaked at 1 month (mean 23.4 ± 4.40; P<.001), with little change at 3 months (mean 22.4 ± 4.79; P = .06) and decreased between 3 months and 6 months (19.4 ± 4.48; P<.001) and between 6 months and 12 months. By 12 months, densitometry had not completely returned to baseline in the entire cohort (mean 17.0 ± 3.82; P<.001) and the keratoconus subgroup; however, it returned to baseline in the ectasia group (16.1 ± 2.41; P = .15). The postoperative course of slitlamp haze was similar to objective densitometry measurements. Increased haze, measured by densitometry, did not correlate with postoperative clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The time course of corneal haze after CXL was objectively quantified; it was greatest at 1 month, plateaued at 3 months, and was significantly decreased between 3 months and 12 months. Changes in haze did not correlate with postoperative clinical outcomes. Financial Disclosure: Drs. Greenstein and Fry and Ms. Bhatt have no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]