Back to Search Start Over

Pre-operative bevacizumab, capecitabine, oxaliplatin and radiation among patients with locally advanced or low rectal cancer: A phase II trial

Authors :
Kennecke, Hagen
Berry, Scott
Wong, Ralph
Zhou, Chen
Tankel, Keith
Easaw, Jacob
Rao, Sanjay
Post, Jacqueline
Hay, John
Source :
European Journal of Cancer. Jan2012, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p37-45. 9p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Abstract: Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pre-operative chemoradiation, using capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab with standard doses of radiation, in patients with high-risk rectal cancer. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or low rectal cancer were treated with capecitabine 825mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 and 22–35, oxaliplatin 50mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22 and 29, bevacizumab 5mg/kg on days 14, 1, 15 and 29, and radiation 50.4Gy in 28 fractions including boost. Total mesorectal excision was performed 7–9weeks after chemoradiation. The primary end-point was complete tumour regression (ypT0NX) by central review. Findings: Forty-two evaluable patients were enrolled, and 38 proceeded to definitive surgery. Eighteen patients (43%) had clinical T4 tumours and/or N2 tumours. Mean relative dose intensity was >90% for all systemic agents, and 97% for radiation. Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 10 patients (24%) and pain in 4 patients (10%) pre-operatively, while grade 3/4 pain, fatigue and infection were each reported among 5 patients (13%) post-operatively. Re-operation due to complications occurred in 4 patients (11%). Complete tumour regression (ypT0) was seen in 9 patients (23.7%) of which two had N1 disease and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0N0) was 18.4%. Central review changed pathologic stage in six cases (16%). Interpretation: In this study, pre-operative bevacizumab added to oxaliplatin, capecitabine and radiation was safe and resulted in a promising tumour regression rate. Surgical complications were closely monitored and occurred with the expected frequency. Central pathology review should be considered for trials with pathologic response as the primary end-point. Funding: British Columbia Cancer Agency, Hoffmann-La Roche Canada and Sanofi-Aventis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09598049
Volume :
48
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
69739306
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.05.016